Production System Modeling

Nodal Analysis, IPR/VLP Curves, and Decline Analysis

Well & Reservoir Data

IPR / VLP Curves

Sensitivity:
Rate (STB/d) Pwf IPR (psi) Pwf VLP (psi) Delta P

Operating Point

Operating Rate
0
STB/d
Flowing BHP
0
psi
Drawdown
0
psi
% Drawdown
0
%
AOF (qmax)
0
STB/d
% of AOF
0
%
Fluid Velocity
0
ft/s
Flow Regime
-
GLR Total
0
scf/STB
Liquid Holdup
0
%
Natural Flow

Well is flowing naturally with adequate pressure support.

IPR Model Comparison

n=1.0 for laminar flow, n=0.5 for turbulent flow

IPR Comparison Chart

Linear PI: q = J * (Pr - Pwf)

Vogel: q/qmax = 1 - 0.2(Pwf/Pr) - 0.8(Pwf/Pr)^2

Fetkovich: q = C * (Pr^2 - Pwf^2)^n

Composite: Linear above Pb, Vogel below Pb

AOF Comparison

Linear AOF
0
STB/d
Vogel AOF
0
STB/d
Composite AOF
0
STB/d
Fetkovich AOF
0
STB/d
Drive Mechanism Recommended
Undersaturated (Pr > Pb) Linear PI
Solution Gas Drive Vogel
Mixed (Pr near Pb) Composite
Gas Wells Fetkovich
High Rate / Turbulent Fetkovich (n<1)

VLP Parameters

VLP Correlation Comparison

Hagedorn-Brown: Best for high GOR wells, liquid holdup correlation

Beggs-Brill: Accounts for inclination angle, most versatile

Gray: Developed for gas condensate wells

Flow Analysis

Hagedorn-Brown
0
psi
Beggs-Brill
0
psi
Gray
0
psi
Avg Difference
0
%
Superficial Vsl
0
ft/s
Superficial Vsg
0
ft/s
Predicted Flow Regime
Slug Flow

Production Data

0 = exponential, 0.3-0.5 = oil, 0.5-0.8 = gas, 1 = harmonic

Format: days,rate - one per line

Decline Curve Analysis

Reserves Estimate

EUR
0
MSTB
Economic Life
0
years
Cum @ 1 yr
0
MSTB
Cum @ 5 yr
0
MSTB
Decline Type Hyperbolic
b Factor 0.5
Nominal Di 25%/yr
Effective De 22.1%/yr
Year Rate (STB/d) Cum (MSTB)